
YuChakTinMichael‘sGIACGCFWProjectAssignment
Page 199
andSmurfstyleattacks,aswellasprovidingan"ondemand"rootshellboundtoa
TCPport.…
Thenetwork:attacker(s)>client(s)>daemon(s)>victim(s)…
Theattacker(s)controloneormoreclients,eachofwhich cancontrolmanydaemons.
Thedaemonsareallinstructedtocoordinateapacketbasedattackagainstoneor
morevictimsystemsbytheclient.”
74
So,ideally,weourselvesshouldactastheattackerswhocontroltheclientsatthe
compromisedsystemstodirectdaemonsrunningontheamplifiers.
BelowisthesyntaxoftheoriginalTFN:
[tribefloodnetwork] (c)1999byMixter
usage:./tfn [ip][port]
containsalistofnumericalhoststhatarereadytoflood
1forspoofmasktype(specify03),2forpacketsize,
is0forstop/status,1forudp,2forsyn,3foricmp,
4tobindarootshell(specifyport)
5tosmurf,firstipistarget,furtheripsarebroadcasts
[ip] targetip[s],separatedby@ifmorethanone
[port] mustbegivenforasynflood,0=RANDOM
Theproblemwehavehereis,TFNworkswellonmostLinuxandUnixflavors(such
asSolarisandRedhat),butnotonWindows! Infact,theWintelversioncannotbe
located(wedon’tevenknowif itexists).Ifthecompromisedsystemsare
Windowsbased,wemayhavetoexcludetheminourplan,oruseanothertool
instead.
A SimplerAttack
Insteadofusing TFN,asimplerwaytolaunch smurfattackispossible.Followthe
74
http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/tfn.analysis
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern